New article | Research methods as bridging devices: path and context mapping in governance
Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Gruezmacher, M., Duineveld, M., Deacon, L., Summers, R., Hallstrom, L. and Jones, K.(2019), “Research methods as bridging devices: path and context mapping in governance”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2019-0185
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential, both analytically and practically, of understanding research methods as bridging devices. Methods can bridge theory and empirics, but it is argued that they can perform several bridging functions: between theory and praxis, between analysis and strategy and between past and future. The focus is on those forms of bridging relevant for understanding and effectuating change in governance, at community level and at the scale of organizations.
Design/methodology/approach – The paper develops a perspective on methods as bridging devices. It uses the newly minted methods of governance path and context mapping as a case study. These methods conceptually derive from evolutionary governance theory (EGT) and were developed and tested in Canadian empirical research. The case helps to develop insight in features, forms and limitations of methods as bridging devices in governance research and practice. The authors then use the case to further develop the initial concept of bridging more generally, emphasizing the shifting balance between methods as bridging and creating boundaries.
Findings – Both the case study and the theoretical analysis underline the necessary imperfection of any method as bridging device. The authors affirm the potential of method to perform different bridging functions at the same time, while revealing clear tradeoffs in each role. Tradeoffs occur with adapted versions of the method producing new strengths and weaknesses in new contexts. In each of the forms of bridging involved neither side can be reduced to the other, so a gap always remains. It is demonstrated that the practice of bridging through method in governance is greatly helped when methods are flexibly deployed in ongoing processes of bricolage, nesting and modification. Governance enables the continuous production of new framing devices and other methods.
Keywords Strategy, Governance, Analysis, Research method, Context mapping, Path mapping
Paper type Research paper
Kristof Van Assche | University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Raoul Beunen | Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Monica Gruezmacher | REES, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Martijn Duineveld | Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Leith Deacon | University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada, and
Robert Summers, Lars Hallstrom and Kevin Jones | University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada